Home / Handbook / How to Demonstrate Average Sentencing Variance
Previous Pattern Sex Conduct
Handbook for Federal Internet Sex Crimes
Next Proposed Amend.
Chapter 9: Sentencing Guidelines
How to Demonstrate Average Sentencing Variance
EXAMPLE ONE: Eastern District of Virginia
Navigate to the district’s Case Management/Electronic Case Files (CM/ECF) system: ecf.vaed.uscourts.gov.
Click on the “Eastern District of Virginia – – Document Filing System” Link.
Log into PACER using your credentials. Accept the Redaction Responsibility notice.
Using the menu at the top of the page, navigate to Reports → Criminal Reports → Criminal Cases
Arrive at the following landing page:
Make the following adjustments:
Select the office you wish to investigate (for example, Alexandria).
Select the citation you wish to investigate (for example, 18:2252A.F).
Next to “Count Status,” check the boxes next to “Pending” and “Disposed.”
Next to “Filed,” select the date range you are interested in (for example, the past five years).
Check the boxes next to “Pending defendants” and “Terminated defendants.”
Select “Run Report.”
Determine which information would be most useful for your case. This could include all of the Court’s sentencing orders for the relevant statute in the last five years, the Court’s last few sentencing orders for the relevant statute, or a specific Judge’s sentencing orders for the relevant statute. For this example, we will look at all of the 18 U.S.C. 2252A cases that Judge T.S. Ellis has presided over for in the last five years (12/1/2018-12/1/2023).
Select the Case Number you are interested in (for example, 1:18-cr-00360-TSE).
Select “Run Report.”
Scroll down and locate the Restitution Order. In this example, it is number 49. Click on the number.
Select “View Document.”
Scroll down to locate the “Imprisonment” section of the judgment.
In this case, Judge Ellis sentenced the defendant to 60 months.
Scroll down to locate the “Statement of Reasons” section of the judgment. Locate “III Court determination of advisory guideline range (before departures).”
In this case, the sentencing guidelines range was 97-121 months. Judge Ellis departed 37 months below the low end of the sentencing guidelines.
Note: For qualitative reasons for the variance, locate the section on “Court Determination for Sentence Outside the Advisory Guideline System.” This provides useful information on the facts of the cases leading to variance, and whether the case is relevant to yours.
Using the spreadsheet program of your choice, create a chart and insert the following information:
Repeat steps #9 – #15 until you have collected all of the information you need (Eliminate the cases that are missing information). Calculate the average variance.
You can now see that in the Alexandria court in the Eastern District of Virginia, in a five-year time span, for the cases that we found information for, Justice Ellis has varied by roughly half below the low end of the sentencing guidelines across their cases.
Note: You can make the case to exclude cases in which the court varies upward from the low end of the guidelines range based on extraordinary facts.
EXAMPLE TWO: Southern District of New York
Navigate to the district’s Case Management/Electronic Case Files (CM/ECF) system: ecf.nysd.uscourts.gov.
Click on the “Southern District of New York – Document Filing System” Link.
Log into PACER using your credentials. Accept the Redaction Responsibility notice.
Using the menu at the top of the page, navigate to Reports → Criminal Reports → Criminal Cases
Arrive at the following landing page:
Make the following adjustments:
Select the office you wish to investigate (for example, White Plains).
Select the citation you wish to investigate (for example, 18:2252A.F).
Next to “Count Status,” check the boxes next to “Pending” and “Disposed.”
Next to “Filed,” select the date range you are interested in (for example, the past five years).
Check the boxes next to “Pending defendants” and “Terminated defendants.”
Select “Run Report.”
Determine which information would be most useful for your case. This could include all of the Court’s sentencing orders for the relevant statute in the last five years, the Court’s last few sentencing orders for the relevant statute, or a specific Judge’s sentencing orders for the relevant statute. For this example, we will look at all of the 18 U.S.C. 2252A cases that Judge Seibel has presided over in the last five years (12/1/2018-12/1/2023).
Select the Case Number you are interested in (for example, 1:19-cr-00682-CS).
Select “History/Documents…”
Scroll down and locate the Judgment. In this example, it is number 31. Click on the number.
Select “View Document.”
Scroll down to locate the “Imprisonment” section of the judgment.
In this case, Judge Seibel sentenced the defendant to 120 months.
Locate the Sentencing Submission. In this example, it is number 30. Click on the number and select View Document.
Locate the section on the guidelines range.
In this case, the sentencing guidelines range was 120-135 months. Judge Seibel imposed the low end of the sentencing guidelines.
Using the spreadsheet program of your choice, create a chart and insert the following information:
Repeat steps #9 – #16 until you have collected all of the information you need (Eliminate the cases that are missing information). Calculate the average variance.
You can now see that in the White Plains court in the Southern District of New York, in a five-year time span, for the cases that we found information for, Justice Seibel has varied by roughly half below the low end of the sentencing guidelines across their cases.
Note: You can make the case to exclude cases in which the court varies upward from the low end of the guidelines range based on extraordinary facts.
EXAMPLE THREE: Northern District of Georgia
Navigate to the district’s Case Management/Electronic Case Files (CM/ECF) system: ecf.nysd.uscourts.gov.
Click on the “Northern District of Georgia – Document Filing System” Link.
Using the menu at the top of the page, navigate to GAND External Rpts → Criminal Cases
Arrive at the following page:
Make the following adjustments:
Select the office you wish to investigate (for example, Atlanta).
Select the citation you wish to investigate (for example, 18:2252A.F).
Next to “Filed,” select the date range you are interested in (for example, the past month).
Select “All Defendants”
Note: In this district, the report date range can be no longer than 31 days. If you enter a date range longer than this the following message will appear:
Select “Submit.”
Select the case number you are interested in (ex. 1:23-cr-00001-JPB)
Select “Run Report.”
Locate the judgment. In this example, it is number 12. Click the number.
Select “View Document.”
Scroll down to locate the “Imprisonment” section of the judgment.
In this example, the defendant was sentenced to 120 months.
Enter the information into a spreadsheet to calculate the average sentence that a judge has ordered for the relevant charge(s). There is not always a way to determine the recommended sentencing guidelines range. However, information from the actual sentences may still be useful for your case.
Jess is known for his meticulous and strategic work style. At his firm, there is a culture of excellence and client focused dedication that is unmatched. He is very thorough during the entire legal process[...]
Rachel K.
Jess Johnson is the perfect attorney to overcome serious legal charges! He is very approachable & will use his expertise to give you the best criminal legal defense possible and I know this from personal[...]
Kathy
BEST IN TOWN! Look no further then Jess Johnson if you want the best trial lawyer to represent you! His dedication and complete commitment to his client is beyond reproach. He is a complete master[...]
Lyle C.
Jess Johnson is the perfect attorney to overcome serious legal charges! He is very approachable & will use his expertise to give you the best criminal legal defense possible and I know this from personal[...]
Rachel K.
Simultaneously brilliant and pragmatic, Cary is the best lawyer you could ever hope for, who will get you the best result possible. He is incredibly knowledgeable and hard working, with the utmost professionalism. Always extremely[...]
Trish
Our family found ourselves in an unimaginable federal criminal case and we knew we needed the best lawyer we could find to defend our family member facing charges. Jess Johnson has a remarkable handle on[...]
Kathy
Cary will fight hard to get the best outcome for you. Cary is brilliant, professional, and extremely knowledgeable. He comes to court well-prepared. Cary works with autistic clients and their families. There are not many[...]