Federal False Statements Defense Lawyer

Contact Johnson/Citronberg   |   (855) 959-4003

Home /  Federal False Statements Defense Lawyer

Federal False Statements Defense Attorney

Our lawyers at Johnson/Citronberg, PLLC have years of experience defending against federal charges across the country. One of the most common criminal statutes used by federal prosecutors is 18 U.S.C. § 1001, known as False Statements.
As an experienced Federal False Statements Defense Lawyer, we are dedicated to providing you with the expertise and aggressive representation needed to protect your rights and defend against these serious charges.

CONTACT JOHNSON/CITRONBERG | (855) 959-4003
While the offense of False Statements is a felony offense, it is generally considered less severe than many other federal crimes. Federal prosecutors often charge people with False Statements in the following situations:

  • Prosecutors believe someone lied during an investigation;
  • Prosecutors believe someone lied on a form to obtain a government benefit;
  • As part of a plea agreement to a lesser charge;
  • Other more serious charges won’t stick;
  • As an “add on” to other charges to make a person seem untrustworthy to a jury.
hire top federal false statements defense lawyer

Testimonials from Our Clients

Maybel G.

Jess is known for his meticulous and strategic work style. At his firm, there is a culture of excellence and client focused dedication that is unmatched. He is very thorough during the entire legal process and always finds a way to solve client problems.
View Live Review

Lyle Cartwright

Jess Johnson is the perfect attorney to overcome serious legal charges! He is very approachable & will use his expertise to give you the best criminal legal defense possible and I know this from personal experience. When you’re going through the scariest period in your life, you need the best lawyer on your side. I give him my highest recommendation!
View Live Review

HOW PROSECUTORS USE § 1001

The statute criminalizing False Statements was originally enacted to prevent people from impeding governmental functions. Today, however, the government uses the statute to coerce people into cooperating in federal investigations, to force people into plea agreements instead of going to trial on more serious allegations, and to accuse people of lying on complex, and often ambiguous, government forms years after the fact.

While a charge for False Statements can occur in any type of case, we see it most often in white collar cases, which typically involve allegations of fraud. Recently, the government has used the offense of False Statements as a tool to strong-arm defendants in PPP (Paycheck Protection Program) loan fraud cases. By offering a plea to False Statements, defendants are not tried for more serious offenses, like wire fraud. The problem is that this practice causes innocent people to be convicted. An experienced criminal defense lawyer can help you navigate these charges, challenge the evidence, and work to ensure that your rights are protected throughout the legal process.


Federal False Statements Defense Case Results

United States v. D.F.
Pilot Found Not Guilty in Major Federal Drug Conspiracy Case

Our client was a pilot and retired military officer. He was accused of knowingly transporting a large quantity of cocaine from southern Texas to Atlanta. If convicted, he likely would have died in prison. We were able to show a jury that our client had no knowledge of the drugs on board his aircraft. The jury returned a not guilty verdict in less than an hour of deliberating.

United States v. R.K.
Federal Judge in Eastern District of Virginia Gives Lowest Possible Sentence to Autistic Client

Our client, a federal employee, was convicted of federal child pornography charges. Based on his autism diagnosis, we convinced a federal judge to give the lowest sentence possible.

United States v. B.J.
Time-Served Sentence in Major Federal Drug Conspiracy Case in Atlanta

Our client was facing life in prison after being charged in a wide-sweeping drug conspiracy case in the Northern District of Georgia. We were able to show that our client was abused by her husband and forced to ingest drugs, which led her becoming addicted. The judge determined that her culpability was the least of the many who were charged and granted our request for a sentence of ‘time-served’ which means no additional jail time. Our client was able to go home to her children the same day that she was sentenced.

Virginia v. R.C.
Dismissal of Child Pornography Charges in Richmond, Virginia for Autistic Client

Our client, a working professional, was charged with distribution of child pornography after law enforcement raided his home. We helped our autistic client and convinced the court to defer all charges for dismissal due to his disability.


DOJ Guidelines

The Department of Justice has guidelines of when federal prosecutors should and should not bring False Statements charges. While the guidelines do afford broad discretion to prosecutors, they do limit when cases can be brought, and a good criminal defense lawyer can use these guidelines to argue for the dismissal of charges.
Timing of Statements
The guidelines are clear that the “Federal interest must exist at the time the false statement is made; it cannot arise after the defendant has made a false statement.” Thus, if there was no federal interest in the statement at the time it was made, the prosecution should not file charges.

As an experienced criminal investigation lawyer, we can analyze your case, determine whether the prosecution has followed these guidelines, and develop a strategy to protect your rights and seek the best possible outcome.
Denials of Guilt
One question that frequently arises is whether to charge defendants who allegedly lied during a federal criminal investigation (e.g., the FBI interviewing a target in an investigation). Prosecutors are not supposed to charge individuals who denied guilt during an investigation. If, however, the individual voluntarily made statements which were not true, DOJ policy permits the individual to be charged with False Statements.


Get Help With Your False Statements Defense Case

Johnson/Citronberg has offices in Alexandria, Virginia and Atlanta, Georgia, and we represent clients across the country in federal court. In cases where we are retained early enough, we have successfully prevented clients from being charged in the first place.

In other cases, we have won dismissals, obtained reductions to avoid harsh mandatory minimums, and achieved some of the lowest sentences possible. If you are looking for a compassionate, results-driven lawyer, give us a call at 855-959-4003.


FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS

A false statement can occur in many different forms. Its most common form, however, has four (4) elements:

  1. A false statement;
  2. The statement was made knowingly and willfully;
  3. The falsity was material, and;
  4. It involved “any matter within the jurisdiction” of the government.

The offense of False Statements can also include concealing a material fact or using a falsified document.

False Statements is a felony offense which carries zero to 5 years in prison. In some cases involving terrorism or sex offenses, the maximum sentence is increased to 8 years in prison.

The statute of limitations for False Statements is 5 years, which begins to run upon completion of the crime.

Yes, it is possible to avoid prison if you are convicted of False Statements as there is no mandatory minimum sentence. This means that a judge could sentence you to probation or house arrest instead of prison.

For a False Statements conviction, the Federal Sentencing Guidelines typically use Section 2B1.1 to calculate the offense level. In most cases, the base offense level is 6 (which recommends a sentence of zero to 6 months in prison). The offense level, however, can increase significantly depending on the loss amount and other enhancements that may apply.

The statute criminalizing false statements is broad. Prime examples of cases the government has previously charged include:

  • Misleading an FBI agent during a federal investigation.
  • Lying on an application for government assistance (such as a PPP loan application).
  • Lying on an application for federal employment.
  • Submitting a false tax return.
  • Misrepresenting facts on forms to get a federal certification.
  • Lying on forms to obtain government ID or passport.
  • False statements to private entities that acting on behalf of or insured by a federal agency.

To be convicted of False Statements the Government does not have to show the following:

  • That the false statement was submitted directly to the federal government.
  • That the government suffered a financial loss.
  • That the government made some decision favorable to the defendant based on the false statement.
  • The defendant had actual knowledge of the federal agency’s jurisdiction.
  • The false statement was written or sworn to.

While every case is different, there are five primary defenses that a defendant can raise in a False Statements case:

  • The statement was not false. The most straightforward defense is to show that the statement in question was in fact true.
  • The statement was in response to an ambiguous question. Some government forms are less than clear. If the statement in question is not clear, the government must negate any reasonable interpretation that could make the statement accurate.
  • The defendant did not know the statement was false. The government has to prove that the defendant knew the statement was false. If the defendant believed that the statement was true (e.g., someone had told him that the statement was accurate) or if the defendant made an honest mistake (e.g., mistakenly putting the wrong number on a complex form), there can be no conviction. For example, in PPP cases, small business owners who were unfamiliar with government aid programs were attempting to fill out complicated forms in a time of extreme stress. In many cases, they believed that they were inputting correct numbers.
  • The statement was not material. The statute only criminalizes false statements that were material in nature. While a jury gets to determine whether something is material, most courts agree that materiality exists when the statement had the capacity to influence the government agency. For example, submission of a false name on a passport application would be considered material. The real question is whether the statement had some weight in the agency’s decision-making process.
  • Jurisdictional Requirement. The Government has to show that the agency had the authority to take some action. In some cases, the statement in question is made to a private entity, and the defense can argue that no federal agency was empowered to take any action based on the statement.

Meet Our Attorneys


                                        Jess Johnson

Jess Johnson

Jess B. Johnson is a Partner & Founder at Johnson/Citronberg, PLLC with more than 15 years of experience in criminal defense and civil litigation. He represents clients in federal courts across the country and is licensed in Georgia, Virginia, and Washington, D.C. Jess has handled complex investigations, trials, and appeals for elected officials, business leaders, whistleblowers, and individuals. He has secured dismissals, acquittals, favorable sentences, and major whistleblower awards. A University of Georgia graduate, Jess was selected as a “Rising Star” by Super Lawyers Magazine every year since 2012.

View Profile

                                        Cary Jacob Citronberg

Cary Jacob Citronberg

Cary Jacob Citronberg is the Partner and Founder of Johnson/Citronberg, PLLC in Alexandria, Virginia, where he focuses on federal and state criminal defense matters. Licensed in Virginia since 2011, he brings more than 14 years of courtroom experience along with a strong record of advocacy. Cary received his J.D. from Georgetown University Law Center in 2010 after earning his B.A. from Northwestern University in 2006. His work has been repeatedly recognized by Super Lawyers, with selections as a Rising Star from 2016 through 2021 and to the Super Lawyers list from 2022 through 2025.

View Profile

Request Your Consultation

Fields Marked With An “*” Are Required

"*" indicates required fields

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
I Have Read The Disclaimer*