|
|
Last Modified on Jul 09, 2026
The most common sentencing enhancement in federal child pornography cases is ‘Use of a Computer.’ This enhancement applies in more than 95% of non-production cases. Found under § 2G2.2(b)(6) of the Federal Sentencing Guidelines, this provision automatically increases a defendant’s offense level by two levels.
For a comprehensive discussion on the computer enhancement, visit our Handbook for Federal Internet Sex Crimes.
What is the 2G2.2(b)(6) Enhancement?
The ‘use of computer’ enhancement states:
If the offense involved the use of a computer or an interactive computer service for the possession, transmission, receipt, or distribution of the material, or for accessing with intent to view the material, increase by 2 levels.
Congress implemented this enhancement with the PROTECT Act in 2003 in an attempt to modernize federal sentencing. It triggers whenever a defendant uses a computer, cell phone, or other electronic device to possess, view, receive, or distribute child pornography.
Because digital devices are required to access the internet, this enhancement has lost its original purpose. Today, it is tacked on to nearly every single case, treating standard behavior as an aggravating factor.
Judicial Backlash: Why Judges Criticize the Enhancement
The core purpose of sentencing enhancements is to ensure that more culpable offenders receive a harsher sentence. Because the computer enhancement applies in virtually every case, judges frequently criticize the enhancement for failing to distinguish between defendants who are more or less culpable.
In 2021, the U.S. Sentencing Commission issued a formal report on non-production offenses confirming the flaw. The Commission found that Section 2G2.2:
- Contains a series of enhancements that have failed to keep pace with technological advancements.
- Covers conduct that has become so ubiquitous that enhancements now apply in the vast majority of cases.
The Reality of Federal Sentencing
Despite the recognized flaw with the computer enhancement, the Guidelines remain unchanged. But the disconnect between the written rules and courtroom reality creates an opening for an effective defense strategy.
Many federal judges recognize the inherent unfairness of the enhancement. Some choose to ignore it entirely, while other frequently grant a downward variance to achieve a just sentence. The data reflects this judicial pushback:
- Below-Guidelines Sentences: Roughly 60% of offenders receive a below-Guidelines sentence.
- The Sentencing Gap: In 2019, the average Guidelines minimum for non-production offenses was 136 months, but the actual sentence imposed by judges was only 103 months.
The computer enhancement is not the only reason for this significant reduction. As alluded to above, the Guidelines impose three other enhancements that apply in the overwhelming number of cases, including a victim under the age of 12 (+2 levels), sadistic conduct (+4 levels), and having more than 600 images (+5 levels). Taken together, these four routine enhancements tack on an additional 13 levels, drastically inflating the recommended prison rage before a judge even considers the specific facts of an individual’s life or character.
At sentencing, a good criminal defense lawyer will explain the history of the computer enhancement and why it should be discounted. When done effectively, a defendant can expect a judge to take this argument to heart and significantly reduce a defendant’s sentence.
Contact Our Firm Today
The lawyers at Johnson/Citronberg have successfully represented clients across the country from Eastern District of Virginia to the Western District of Washington. Our lawyers are experts in defending child pornography charges, and we routinely obtain some of the lowest sentences possible, including probation. If you or someone you know has been charged with a child pornography offense, give our firm a call. The consultation is always free of charge.
