Contact Johnson/Citronberg | (855) 959-4003
After an arrest for federal child pornography charges, the government will typically file a motion with the court to hold the defendant in custody until the case is resolved. Some offenses (like receipt, distribution, and transportation of child pornography) have a presumption that no conditions of release are adequate, and the defense must put forth evidence to rebut that presumption. Defendants often do win release on bond, but it is usually under strict conditions, such as electronic monitoring, a curfew, and limited internet access.
If you or someone you know is facing federal child pornography charges, visit our main page to learn how we defend these charges.
For bail purposes, federal law treats every felony charged under the child exploitation statutes as a “crime of violence” (18 USC § 3156(a)(4)(C)), even when there is no violence alleged. This allows the government to file a motion with the court requesting a detention hearing and to hold the defendant in custody pending trial (18 USC § 3142(f)(1)).
Federal law requires the detention hearing to occur at the defendant’s first appearance in court, but in practice, the defense or the government will usually ask for a continuance. The law allows the defense a continuance of up to five days and the government a continuance up to three days (excluding Saturday, Sunday, and legal holidays). If a continuance is granted by the court, the defendant will remain in custody until the detention hearing.
The rules of evidence that apply in criminal trials do not apply at detention hearings, and judges often rely on agent summaries, hearsay, and proffers from the government.
The ultimate question for the judge is whether any conditions of bond will reasonably assure the defendant’s appearance in court and the safety of the community. It is important to note that a finding that no condition will reasonably assure the safety of the community must be supported by clear and convincing evidence.
For certain charges, the law presumes that the defendant should be detained. This includes:
The presumption does not apply to possession of child pornography cases. While the government can still move for detention in simple possession cases, it does not get a head start.
The presumption does not mean that the defendant will be automatically detained. But it does mean that the defense must offer some evidence showing that the person will return to court and that the person will not be a threat to anyone’s safety. If the defendant is able to offer such evidence, the government must then prove that detention is necessary.
The Bail Reform Act lists four factors (18 USC § 3142(g)):
The strongest defense presentation at a detention hearing usually includes live witnesses as well as a reliable plan. Judges typically want to see that someone will be responsible for the defendant to make sure that all conditions of release are followed, and judges often want to ask that person questions about their living arrangements and ability to supervise the defendant. If a judge can be persuaded to give a bond at a detention hearing, it is usually because the defense satisfied these concerns:
Preparing this plan takes time, which is why it matters to involve a lawyer as early as possible. When counsel is hired before an arrest, it is sometimes possible to arrange a voluntary surrender and prepare for the detention hearing in advance.
Federal law generally requires a host of bond conditions any time there is a minor victim. This includes electronic monitoring, restrictions on personal associations, housing, and travel, no contact with witnesses or victims, a curfew, and no firearms. Courts routinely add the following conditions:
While federal courts use cash bail in some cases, it is not as common as in state courts. Federal courts often use unsecured bonds, which are promises to pay a set amount if the defendant fails to appear. This is because federal courts are generally more likely to deny bond altogether, so the people who are released tend to be very low risk. In fact, only about 1% of defendants released on bond in federal court failed to appear.
Detained defendants are often held in local jails under contract with the U.S. Marshals Service. Often, the condition of these jails can be poor, and it can be difficult for defendants to see family members. Detention also makes it much harder to work with and communicate with defense counsel. Release lets a defendant keep working, support family, take part in the defense, and begin mental health treatment (which can have a big impact at sentencing).
Can I be detained if I’m charged only with possession? Yes. The government can seek detention in any federal child pornography case. But possession does not carry a presumption of detention, which makes it easier to get a bond from the court.
How soon is the detention hearing? While the detention hearing is supposed to occur at the first court appearance (usually within a day or two of the arrest), the government or the defense can ask for a continuance (three or five days respectively). The defendant stays in custody while waiting for the detention hearing.
What happens if I am detained? The judge must issue a written order explaining the reasons for detention, and the defendant will be held at a local jail or federal detention facility awaiting trial.
Will I have to post money to be released? Maybe. The court can set a secured bond, meaning that you will have to pay a certain amount to be released. The court, however, may set an unsecured bond, which does not require you to post any funds.
Can a detention order be challenged? Yes. The hearing can be reopened before trial if new information comes to light. The defense can also appeal a magistrate judge’s detention order to the district court judge assigned to the case. A detention order can also be appealed to the court of appeals.
Johnson/Citronberg defends people charged with federal child pornography offenses in federal courts across the country. If you or a family member has been charged or is being investigated, give us a call. The work done before the detention hearing can decide whether you can return home while your case is pending.